首页龙虾技能列表 › Agent Team Orchestration — 智能体团队编排

Agent Team Orchestration — 智能体团队编排

v1.0.0

编排具有定义角色、任务生命周期、交接协议和审查工作流的多智能体团队。用于:(1) 组建 2 个以上具有不同专业的智能体团队,(2) 定义任务路由和生命周期(收件箱 → 规格 → 构建 → 审查 → 完成),(3) 创建智能体之间的交接协议,(4) 建立审查和质量门,(5) 管理智能体之间的异步通信和工件共享。

54· 19,100·0 当前·0 累计

运行时依赖

无特殊依赖

安装命令 点击复制

官方clawhub install agent-team-orchestration
镜像加速clawhub install agent-team-orchestration --registry https://www.longxiaskill.com

技能文档

Production playbook for running multi-agent teams with clear roles, structured task flow, and quality gates.

Quick Start: Minimal 2-Agent Team

A builder and a reviewer. The simplest useful team.

1. Define Roles

Orchestrator (you) — Route tasks, track state, report results
Builder agent     — Execute work, produce artifacts

2. Spawn a Task

1. Create task record (file, DB, or task board)
  • Spawn builder with:
- Task ID and description - Output path for artifacts - Handoff instructions (what to produce, where to put it)
  • On completion: review artifacts, mark done, report

3. Add a Reviewer

Builder produces artifact → Reviewer checks it → Orchestrator ships or returns

That's the core loop. Everything below scales this pattern.

Core Concepts

Roles

Every agent has one primary role. Overlap causes confusion.

RolePurposeModel guidance
OrchestratorRoute work, track state, make priority callsHigh-reasoning model (handles judgment)
BuilderProduce artifacts — code, docs, configsCan use cost-effective models for mechanical work
ReviewerVerify quality, push back on gapsHigh-reasoning model (catches what builders miss)
OpsCron jobs, standups, health checks, dispatchingCheapest model that's reliable
Read references/team-setup.md when defining a new team or adding agents.

Task States

Every task moves through a defined lifecycle:

Inbox → Assigned → In Progress → Review → Done | Failed

Rules:

  • Orchestrator owns state transitions — don't rely on agents to update their own status
  • Every transition gets a comment (who, what, why)
  • Failed is a valid end state — capture why and move on

Read references/task-lifecycle.md when designing task flows or debugging stuck tasks.

Handoffs

When work passes between agents, the handoff message includes:

  • What was done — summary of changes/output
  • Where artifacts are — exact file paths
  • How to verify — test commands or acceptance criteria
  • Known issues — anything incomplete or risky
  • What's next — clear next action for the receiving agent

Bad handoff: "Done, check the files." Good handoff: "Built auth module at /shared/artifacts/auth/. Run npm test auth to verify. Known issue: rate limiting not implemented yet. Next: reviewer checks error handling edge cases."

Reviews

Cross-role reviews prevent quality drift:

  • Builders review specs — "Is this feasible? What's missing?"
  • Reviewers check builds — "Does this match the spec? Edge cases?"
  • Orchestrator reviews priorities — "Is this the right work right now?"

Skip the review step and quality degrades within 3-5 tasks. Every time.

Read references/communication.md when setting up agent communication channels.Read references/patterns.md for proven multi-step workflows.

Reference Files

FileRead when...
team-setup.mdDefining agents, roles, models, workspaces
task-lifecycle.mdDesigning task states, transitions, comments
communication.mdSetting up async/sync communication, artifact paths
patterns.mdImplementing specific workflows (spec→build→test, parallel research, escalation)

Common Pitfalls

Spawning without clear artifact output paths

Agent produces great work, but you can't find it. Always specify the exact output path in the spawn prompt. Use a shared artifacts directory with predictable structure.

No review step = quality drift

"It's a small change, skip review." Do this three times and you have compounding errors. Every artifact gets at least one set of eyes that didn't produce it.

Agents not commenting on task progress

Silent agents create coordination blind spots. Require comments at: start, blocker, handoff, completion. If an agent goes silent, assume it's stuck.

Not verifying agent capabilities before assigning

Assigning browser-based testing to an agent without browser access. Assigning image work to a text-only model. Check capabilities before routing.

Orchestrator doing execution work

The orchestrator routes and tracks — it doesn't build. The moment you start "just quickly doing this one thing," you've lost oversight of the rest of the team.

When NOT to Use This Skill

  • Single-agent setups — Just follow standard AGENTS.md conventions. Team orchestration adds overhead that solo agents don't need.
  • One-off task delegation — Use sessions_spawn directly. This skill is for sustained workflows with multiple handoffs.
  • Simple question routing — If you're just forwarding a question to a specialist, that's a message, not a workflow.

This skill is for sustained team workflows — recurring collaboration patterns where agents depend on each other's output over multiple tasks.

数据来源:ClawHub ↗ · 中文优化:龙虾技能库
OpenClaw 技能定制 / 插件定制 / 私有工作流定制

免费技能或插件可能存在安全风险,如需更匹配、更安全的方案,建议联系付费定制

了解定制服务