一套全面的财务分析技能,使AI代理能够生成可辩护的、CFO级别的财务输出。这里的每项技术都基于标准会计实践(兼容美国GAAP / IFRS),专为处理真实财务数据的代理设计。
适用场景
- 月度/季度财务结账周期
- 预算与实际结果的差异分析
- 现金流预测和13周滚动仪表板
- 生成CFO评论和董事会级别的叙述
- 贷款契约或投资者报告的比率分析
- AR/AP账龄分析和收款优先级
- 银行对账模式匹配
不适用场景
- 税务申报准备或税务咨询(使用税务合规技能)
- 审计意见或鉴证工作(需要人类CPA签字)
- 监管申报(SEC、州申报——需要合规审查)
- 估值工作(DCF、可比分析——需要专门的估值技能)
- 薪资处理或HR相关财务工作
1. 差异分析方法
差异分析将预算与实际之间的差异分解为价格、数量和组合三个组成部分。
价格差异
衡量实际价格与预算价格差异的影响,保持数量不变。
价格差异 = (实际价格 - 预算价格) × 实际数量
示例:
预算:1,000 单位 @ $50 = $50,000
实际:1,000 单位 @ $53 = $53,000
价格差异 = ($53 - $50) × 1,000 = $3,000 不利(成本)或有利(收入)
数量差异
衡量实际数量与预算数量差异的影响,使用预算价格。
数量差异 = (实际数量 - 预算数量) × 预算价格
示例:
预算:1,000 单位 @ $50 = $50,000
实际:1,100 单位 @ $50 = $55,000
数量差异 = (1,100 - 1,000) × $50 = $5,000 有利(收入)
组合差异
当存在多种产品时,组合差异分离销售比例与计划不同所产生的影响。
组合差异 = (实际组合% - 预算组合%) × 实际总数量 × 预算边际
三方对账
始终进行对账:总差异 = 价格差异 + 数量差异 + 组合差异
如果三者之和不等于总差异,则存在计算错误。绝不要呈现未对账的差异。
重要性阈值
| 指标 | 阈值 | 操作 |
|---|
| 收入项目 | >5% 或 >$10K | 需要书面解释 |
| 费用项目 | >10% 或 >$5K | 需要书面解释 |
| 净收入影响 | >2% | 需要CFO评论 |
| 资产负债表项目 | >$25K | 需要对账 |
根据实体规模调整阈值。一家200万美元的公司与一家2亿美元的公司使用不同的阈值。
2. 现金流预测(13周滚动)
13周现金流预测是流动性管理的标准工具。它按周覆盖整整一个季度。
结构
周 → W1 W2 W3 W4 ... W13 总计
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
期初现金 100K 112K 108K 95K XXK 100K流入
收款 50K 45K 55K 40K XXK XXX
其他收入 2K 1K 3K 2K XXK XXX
总流入 52K 46K 58K 42K XXK XXX
流出
薪资 (20K) — (20K) — XXK XXX
租金 (5K) — — — XXK XXX
供应商 (10K) (12K) (8K) (15K) XXK XXX
债务偿还 — (5K) — — XXK XXX
其他 (5K) (3K) (3K) (4K) XXK XXX
总流出 (40K) (20K) (31K) (19K) XXK XXX
净现金流 12K (4K) (13K) 23K XXK XXX
期末现金 112K 108K 95K 118K XXK XXX
最低余额要求 50K 50K 50K 50K 50K 50K
盈余/(赤字) 62K 58K 45K 68K XXK XXX
收款假设
从历史数据构建收款曲线:
发票条款 收款模式
─────────────────────────────────────
Net 30 第1个月: 15%, 第2个月: 70%, 第3个月: 12%, 坏账: 3%
Net 15 第1个月: 80%, 第2个月: 17%, 坏账: 3%
COD 第1个月: 97%, 坏账: 3%
预测准确性跟踪
每周将上周的预测与实际进行比较:
预测准确率 = 1 - |实际 - 预测| / |预测|
目标:1周预测准确率 >90%,4周预测准确率 >80%
红旗警示
- 任何一周期末现金低于最低余额要求
- 连续三周现金下降
- 收款低于预测的85%
- 集中风险:任何单一客户占每周流入的>25%
3. 月末结账清单
一套严谨的10步结账流程。目标:月末后5个工作日内完成。
10个步骤
步骤 任务 负责人 天数 验证
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
1 截止AR/AP AR/AP D+1 最后发票号匹配
2 银行对账 Cash D+1 所有项目<30天
3 记录应计项 GL D+2 应计计划表已签署
4 记录折旧/摊销 GL D+2 固定资产台账一致
5 公司间抵消 GL D+3 IC余额净额为零
6 收入确认审查 Rev D+3 ASC 606清单完成
7 库存/COGS对账 Ops D+3 实物与账面<2%
8 准备试算平衡表 GL D+4 借方=贷方
9 差异分析 FP&A D+4 所有重要项目已解释
10 管理层审查与签字 CFO D+5 已签署的结账包
应计项目清单
容易遗漏的常见应计项:
- [ ] 薪资应计(已工作但尚未支付的天数)
- [ ] 奖金应计(按期间比例)
- [ ] 债务利息应计
- [ ] 水电费应计
- [ ] 已收到但未开票的专业服务
- [ ] 保险摊销
- [ ] 预付费用摊销
- [ ] 递延收入确认
日记账分录标准
每个日记账分录必须包括:
- 日期
- 借方账户及金额
- 贷方账户及金额
- 解释分录的说明/备注
- 支持性文件参考
- 编制人和审批人
示例:
日期:2026-02-28
借 6100 - 专业服务费 $15,000
贷 2100 - 应计费用 $15,000
备注:根据业务委托书#2026-041应计2月法律费用
支持文件:律师确认2月活动的电子邮件
编制:代理 | 审批:[CFO姓名]
4. CFO评论模板
CFO评论回答三个问题:发生了什么变化?为什么?我们应该做什么?
收入评论模板
## 收入:$X.XM vs 预算 $X.XM (↑/↓ X.X%)发生了什么变化:
- [产品/服务线]收入比预算[高出/低于]$XXK
- [数量/价格/组合]是主要驱动因素
为什么:
- [根本原因——具体说明:失去客户、延迟交易、新合同、季节性]
- [如适用,次要原因]
应该做什么:
- [行动项1,包含负责人和截止日期]
- [行动项2,包含负责人和截止日期]
展望:
- [下一期间的前瞻性陈述]
- [需要标记的风险/机会]
费用评论模板
## 运营费用:$X.XM vs 预算 $X.XM (↑/↓ X.X%)发生了什么变化:
- [费用类别]比预算[超出/低于]$XXK
- [一次性与经常性分类]
为什么:
- [根本原因——招聘时机、供应商价格上涨、项目延迟等]
应该做什么:
- [如超支:缓解计划或超支批准]
- [如节约:节省是否永久或时间性]
现金状况评论
## 现金状况:$X.XM (较上月↑/↓ $XXK)主要变动:
- 运营现金流:$XXK [正/负]
- 收款:收到$XXK vs 开票$XXK(XX%收款率)
- 大额付款:[列出任何>$25K的单笔付款]
流动性展望:
- 现金流 runway:按当前消耗率XX个月
- 契约:[合规 / 接近阈值]
- 下一个重大现金事件:[日期和描述]
5. 预算与实际分析
报告结构
实际 预算 差异$ 差异% 上年 同比%
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
收入
产品A 450K 500K (50K) -10.0% 380K +18.4%
产品B 320K 300K 20K +6.7% 290K +10.3%
服务 180K 200K (20K) -10.0% 150K +20.0%
总收入 950K 1,000K (50K) -5.0% 820K +15.9%销货成本 (380K) (400K) 20K -5.0% (340K) +11.8%
毛利润 570K 600K (30K) -5.0% 480K +18.8%
毛利率 60.0% 60.0% — — 58.5% +1.5pp
运营费用
薪资 (250K) (240K) (10K) +4.2% (200K) +25.0%
营销 (60K) (80K) 20K -25.0% (50K) +20.0%
一般及行政 (45K) (50K) 5K -10.0% (40K) +12.5%
总运营费用 (355K) (370K) 15K -4.1% (290K) +22.4%
EBITDA 215K 230K (15K) -6.5% 190K +13.2%
EBITDA利润率 22.6% 23.0% -0.4pp — 23.2% -0.6pp
瀑布分析
对于董事会演示,将差异分解为瀑布图:
预算EBITDA $230K
收入不足 (50K) ← 数量: (30K), 价格: (15K), 组合: (5K)
销货成本有利 20K ← 材料成本低于预期
薪资超支 (10K) ← 比计划提前2周招聘
营销节约 20K ← 活动推迟到下个月
一般及行政节约 5K ← 办公租赁谈判
实际EBITDA $215K
6. 比率分析
流动性比率
| 比率 | 公式 | 健康范围 | 红旗警示 |
|---|
| 流动比率 | 流动资产 / 流动负债 | 1.5 - 3.0 | < 1.0 |
| 速动比率 | (现金 + 应收账款) / 流动负债 | 1.0 - 2.0 | < 0.5 |
| 现金比率 | 现金 / 流动负债 | 0.5 - 1.0 | < 0.2 |
| 营运资本 | 流动资产 - 流动负债 | 正数 | 负向趋势 |
盈利能力比率
| 比率 | 公式 | 说明 |
|---|
| 毛利率 | 毛利润 / 收入 | 与行业基准比较 |
| 营业利润率 | 营业收入 / 收入 | 排除一次性项目 |
| 净利润率 | 净利润 / 收入 | 扣除所有费用后 |
| EBITDA利润率 | EBITDA / 收入 | 公司间最具可比性 |
| ROE | 净利润 / 平均权益 | 应超过权益成本 |
| ROA | 净利润 / 平均资产 | 资产效率衡量 |
杠杆比率
| 比率 | 公式 | 典型契约要求 | 警告 |
|---|
| 债务/权益 | 总债务 / 总权益 | < 2.0x | > 3.0x |
| 债务/EBITDA | 总债务 / EBITDA | < 3.0x | > 4.0x |
| 利息保障倍数 | EBITDA / 利息费用 | > 3.0x | < 2.0x |
| 固定费用保障倍数 | (EBITDA - 资本支出) / (利息 + 本金) | > 1.2x | < 1.0x |
效率比率
| 比率 | 公式 | 目标 |
|---|
| DSO(应收账款周转天数) | (AR / 收入) × 天数 | < 付款条款 |
| DPO(应付账款周转天数) | (AP / COGS) × 天数 | 匹配或超过DSO |
| DIO(库存周转天数) | (库存 / COGS) × 天数 | 行业特定 |
| 现金转换周期 | DSO + DIO - DPO | 越低越好 |
7. 账龄分析
应收账款账龄
客户 当期 1-30天 31-60天 61-90天 90天以上 总计 占AR比例
──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Acme Corp 25,000 10,000 5,000 — — 40,000 26.7%
Beta LLC 15,000 8,000 — 3,000 — 26,000 17.3%
Gamma Inc 20,000 — — — 12,000 32,000 21.3%
其他客户 30,000 15,000 5,000 2,000 — 52,000 34.7%
──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
总计 90,000 33,000 10,000 5,000 12,000 150,000 100%
占比 60.0% 22.0% 6.7% 3.3% 8.0% 100%
准备金率 0% 0% 5% 25% 50%
准备金金额 — — 500 1,250 6,000 7,750
收款优先级矩阵
| 区间 | 行动 | 频率 | 升级 |
|---|
| 当期 | 感谢/维护关系 | 每月 | 无 |
| 逾期1-30天 | 友好提醒邮件 | 每周 | 无 |
| 逾期31-60天 | 电话+正式信函 | 每周2次 | AR经理 |
| 逾期61-90天 | 催款函+还款计划 | 每天 | 财务主管 |
| 逾期90天以上 | 法律审查+准备金 | 每天 | CFO |
应付账款账龄
镜像AR结构,但优化以下方面:
- 提前付款折扣(2/10 Net 30 = 36.7%年化收益率)
- 现金流时间安排(在条款最后一天付款,不提前)
- 供应商关系管理(战略供应商优先)
8. 银行对账模式
标准对账格式
银行对账单余额(2026年2月28日) $125,432.18加:在途存款
2月27日 - 客户付款#4521 8,500.00
2月28日 - 电汇(待处理) 15,000.00
23,500.00
减:未兑现支票
支票#3041(1月15日)- 供应商付款 (2,300.00)
支票#3055(2月20日)- 租金 (5,000.00)
支票#3058(2月25日)- 办公用品 (450.00)
(7,750.00)
减:银行错误
(本期无) 0.00
调整后银行余额 $141,182.18
总账账面余额(2026年2月28日) $141,682.18
减:银行手续费
月度服务费 (35.00)
电汇费 (25.00)
加:利息收入
2月利息 12.00
减:NSF支票
ABC客户 - 退票 (452.00)
调整后账面余额 $141,182.18
差异 $0.00 ✓ 已对账
过期项目调查
任何超过30天的对账项目都需要调查:
| 期限 | 项目类型 | 行动 |
|---|
| 30-60天 | 未兑现支票 | 联系收款人,确认收到 |
| 60-90天 | 未兑现支票 | 如需,作废并重开 |
| 90天以上 | 未兑现支票 | 作废,冲销分录,审查无人认领财产 |
| 30天以上 | 在途存款 | 与银行调查,可能存在错账 |
9. 财务报表审查清单
在发布任何财务报表之前,验证:
资产负债表
- [ ] 资产 = 负债 + 权益(必须精确到分)
- [ ] 现金与银行对账单一致
- [ ] AR与账龄报告和子分类账一致
- [ ] AP与账龄报告和子分类账一致
- [ ] 固定资产与折旧计划表一致
- [ ] 债务余额与贷款对账单一致
- [ ] 留存收益 = 前期留存收益 + 净收入 - 股利
- [ ] 公司间余额抵消为零
利润表
- [ ] 收入确认符合ASC 606 / IFRS 15标准
- [ ] COGS与库存变动匹配
- [ ] 折旧/摊销与固定资产计划表匹配
- [ ] 利息费用与债务计划表匹配
- [ ] 税务准备合理(有效税率在预期范围内)
- [ ] 无不披露的线下项目
- [ ] 期间对比合理(无符号错误)
现金流量表
- [ ] 经营 + 投资 + 筹资 = 现金变动
- [ ] 现金变动与资产负债表现金变动一致
- [ ] 非现金项目正确排除在经营部分之外
- [ ] 资本支出在投资部分与固定资产增加一致
- [ ] 债务所得/付款与资产负债表债务变动一致
- [ ] 补充披露(支付的利息、支付的税款)准确
分析性审查
- [ ] 毛利率在前期的2个百分点以内(或已解释)
- [ ] 收入增长与已知业务活动一致
- [ ] 无>25%无法解释差异的费用项目
- [ ] 比率(流动比率、速动比率、杠杆比率)在契约要求范围内
- [ ] 月度趋势合理
- [ ] YTD数字与月度数字之和匹配
A comprehensive financial analysis skill that enables AI agents to produce defensible, CFO-ready financial outputs. Every technique here is grounded in standard accounting practice (US GAAP / IFRS compatible) and designed for agents operating on real financial data.
When to Use
- Monthly/quarterly financial close cycles
- Variance analysis on budget vs actual results
- Cash flow forecasting and 13-week rolling dashboards
- Generating CFO commentary and board-ready narratives
- Ratio analysis for lending covenants or investor reporting
- AR/AP aging analysis and collections prioritization
- Bank reconciliation pattern matching
When NOT to Use
- Tax return preparation or tax advisory (use a tax compliance skill)
- Audit opinions or attestation work (requires human CPA sign-off)
- Regulatory filings (SEC, state filings — requires compliance review)
- Valuation work (DCF, comps — requires a valuation-specific skill)
- Payroll processing or HR-related financial work
1. Variance Analysis Methodology
Variance analysis decomposes the difference between budget and actual into price, volume, and mix components.
Price Variance
Measures the impact of actual price differing from budgeted price, holding volume constant.
Price Variance = (Actual Price - Budget Price) × Actual Volume
Example:
Budget: 1,000 units @ $50 = $50,000
Actual: 1,000 units @ $53 = $53,000
Price Variance = ($53 - $50) × 1,000 = $3,000 Unfavorable (cost) or Favorable (revenue)
Volume Variance
Measures the impact of actual volume differing from budgeted volume, at budgeted price.
Volume Variance = (Actual Volume - Budget Volume) × Budget Price
Example:
Budget: 1,000 units @ $50 = $50,000
Actual: 1,100 units @ $50 = $55,000
Volume Variance = (1,100 - 1,000) × $50 = $5,000 Favorable (revenue)
Mix Variance
When multiple products exist, mix variance isolates the impact of selling a different proportion than planned.
Mix Variance = (Actual Mix% - Budget Mix%) × Actual Total Volume × Budget Margin
Three-Way Reconciliation
Always reconcile: Total Variance = Price Variance + Volume Variance + Mix Variance
If the three don't sum to the total, you have a calculation error. Never present unreconciled variances.
Materiality Thresholds
| Metric | Threshold | Action |
|---|
| Revenue line item | >5% or >$10K | Requires written explanation |
| Expense line item | >10% or >$5K | Requires written explanation |
| Net income impact | >2% | Requires CFO commentary |
| Balance sheet item | >$25K | Requires reconciliation |
Adjust thresholds based on entity size. A $2M company uses different thresholds than a $200M company.
2. Cash Flow Forecasting (13-Week Rolling)
The 13-week cash flow forecast is the standard tool for liquidity management. It covers one full quarter on a weekly basis.
Structure
Week → W1 W2 W3 W4 ... W13 Total
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Opening Cash 100K 112K 108K 95K XXK 100KINFLOWS
Collections 50K 45K 55K 40K XXK XXX
Other Income 2K 1K 3K 2K XXK XXX
Total Inflows 52K 46K 58K 42K XXK XXX
OUTFLOWS
Payroll (20K) — (20K) — XXK XXX
Rent (5K) — — — XXK XXX
Vendors (10K) (12K) (8K) (15K) XXK XXX
Debt Service — (5K) — — XXK XXX
Other (5K) (3K) (3K) (4K) XXK XXX
Total Outflows (40K) (20K) (31K) (19K) XXK XXX
Net Cash Flow 12K (4K) (13K) 23K XXK XXX
Closing Cash 112K 108K 95K 118K XXK XXX
Min Balance Req 50K 50K 50K 50K 50K 50K
Surplus/(Deficit)62K 58K 45K 68K XXK XXX
Collection Assumptions
Build collection curves from historical data:
Invoice Terms Collection Pattern
─────────────────────────────────────
Net 30 Month 1: 15%, Month 2: 70%, Month 3: 12%, Bad debt: 3%
Net 15 Month 1: 80%, Month 2: 17%, Bad debt: 3%
COD Month 1: 97%, Bad debt: 3%
Forecast Accuracy Tracking
Every week, compare last week's forecast to actual:
Forecast Accuracy = 1 - |Actual - Forecast| / |Forecast|
Target: >90% accuracy on 1-week forecast, >80% on 4-week
Red Flags
- Closing cash below minimum balance requirement in any week
- Three consecutive weeks of declining cash
- Collections falling below 85% of forecast
- Concentration: any single customer >25% of weekly inflows
3. Month-End Close Checklist
A disciplined 10-step close process. Target: complete within 5 business days of month-end.
The 10 Steps
Step Task Owner Day Verification
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
1 Cut off AR/AP AR/AP D+1 Last invoice # matches
2 Bank reconciliation Cash D+1 All items <30 days
3 Record accruals GL D+2 Accrual schedule signed
4 Record depreciation/amortization GL D+2 Fixed asset register ties
5 Intercompany eliminations GL D+3 IC balances net to zero
6 Revenue recognition review Rev D+3 ASC 606 checklist complete
7 Inventory/COGS reconciliation Ops D+3 Physical vs book <2%
8 Prepare trial balance GL D+4 Debits = Credits
9 Variance analysis FP&A D+4 All material items explained
10 Management review & sign-off CFO D+5 Signed close package
Accrual Checklist
Common accruals that get missed:
- [ ] Payroll accrual (days worked but not yet paid)
- [ ] Bonus accrual (pro-rata for period)
- [ ] Interest accrual on debt
- [ ] Utility accruals
- [ ] Professional services received but not invoiced
- [ ] Insurance amortization
- [ ] Prepaid expense amortization
- [ ] Deferred revenue recognition
Journal Entry Standards
Every journal entry must include:
- Date
- Debit account(s) with amount
- Credit account(s) with amount
- Description/memo explaining the entry
- Supporting documentation reference
- Preparer and approver
Example:
Date: 2026-02-28
DR 6100 - Professional Services $15,000
CR 2100 - Accrued Expenses $15,000
Memo: Accrue Feb legal fees per engagement letter #2026-041
Support: Email from counsel confirming Feb activity
Prepared: Agent | Approved: [CFO Name]
4. CFO Commentary Templates
CFO commentary answers three questions: What changed? Why? What should we do?
Revenue Commentary Template
## Revenue: $X.XM vs Budget $X.XM (↑/↓ X.X%)What changed:
- [Product/Service line] revenue was $XXK [above/below] budget
- [Volume/Price/Mix] was the primary driver
Why:
- [Root cause — be specific: lost customer, delayed deal, new contract, seasonal]
- [Secondary cause if applicable]
What to do:
- [Action item 1 with owner and deadline]
- [Action item 2 with owner and deadline]
Outlook:
- [Forward-looking statement for next period]
- [Risk/opportunity to flag]
Expense Commentary Template
## Operating Expenses: $X.XM vs Budget $X.XM (↑/↓ X.X%)What changed:
- [Expense category] was $XXK [over/under] budget
- [One-time vs recurring classification]
Why:
- [Root cause — hiring timing, vendor price increase, project delay, etc.]
What to do:
- [If over: mitigation plan or approval to exceed]
- [If under: whether savings are permanent or timing]
Cash Position Commentary
## Cash Position: $X.XM (↑/↓ $XXK from prior month)Key movements:
- Operating cash flow: $XXK [positive/negative]
- Collections: $XXK received vs $XXK billed (XX% collection rate)
- Major payments: [List any >$25K individual payments]
Liquidity outlook:
- Runway: XX months at current burn rate
- Covenants: [In compliance / approaching threshold]
- Next major cash event: [Date and description]
5. Budget vs Actual Analysis
Report Structure
Actual Budget Var $ Var % Prior Yr YoY %
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Revenue
Product A 450K 500K (50K) -10.0% 380K +18.4%
Product B 320K 300K 20K +6.7% 290K +10.3%
Services 180K 200K (20K) -10.0% 150K +20.0%
Total Revenue 950K 1,000K (50K) -5.0% 820K +15.9%COGS (380K) (400K) 20K -5.0% (340K) +11.8%
Gross Profit 570K 600K (30K) -5.0% 480K +18.8%
Gross Margin 60.0% 60.0% — — 58.5% +1.5pp
Operating Expenses
Salaries (250K) (240K) (10K) +4.2% (200K) +25.0%
Marketing (60K) (80K) 20K -25.0% (50K) +20.0%
G&A (45K) (50K) 5K -10.0% (40K) +12.5%
Total OpEx (355K) (370K) 15K -4.1% (290K) +22.4%
EBITDA 215K 230K (15K) -6.5% 190K +13.2%
EBITDA Margin 22.6% 23.0% -0.4pp — 23.2% -0.6pp
Waterfall Analysis
For board presentations, decompose the variance into a waterfall:
Budget EBITDA $230K
Revenue shortfall (50K) ← Volume: (30K), Price: (15K), Mix: (5K)
COGS favorability 20K ← Material costs lower than expected
Salary overage (10K) ← Hired 2 weeks earlier than planned
Marketing savings 20K ← Campaign delayed to next month
G&A savings 5K ← Office lease negotiation
Actual EBITDA $215K
6. Ratio Analysis
Liquidity Ratios
| Ratio | Formula | Healthy Range | Red Flag |
|---|
| Current Ratio | Current Assets / Current Liabilities | 1.5 - 3.0 | < 1.0 |
| Quick Ratio | (Cash + Receivables) / Current Liabilities | 1.0 - 2.0 | < 0.5 |
| Cash Ratio | Cash / Current Liabilities | 0.5 - 1.0 | < 0.2 |
| Working Capital | Current Assets - Current Liabilities | Positive | Negative trend |
Profitability Ratios
| Ratio | Formula | Notes |
|---|
| Gross Margin | Gross Profit / Revenue | Compare to industry benchmarks |
| Operating Margin | Operating Income / Revenue | Exclude one-time items |
| Net Margin | Net Income / Revenue | After all charges |
| EBITDA Margin | EBITDA / Revenue | Most comparable across companies |
| ROE | Net Income / Avg Equity | Should exceed cost of equity |
| ROA | Net Income / Avg Assets | Asset efficiency measure |
Leverage Ratios
| Ratio | Formula | Covenant Typical | Warning |
|---|
| Debt/Equity | Total Debt / Total Equity | < 2.0x | > 3.0x |
| Debt/EBITDA | Total Debt / EBITDA | < 3.0x | > 4.0x |
| Interest Coverage | EBITDA / Interest Expense | > 3.0x | < 2.0x |
| Fixed Charge Coverage | (EBITDA - CapEx) / (Interest + Principal) | > 1.2x | < 1.0x |
Efficiency Ratios
| Ratio | Formula | Target |
|---|
| DSO (Days Sales Outstanding) | (AR / Revenue) × Days | < Payment terms |
| DPO (Days Payable Outstanding) | (AP / COGS) × Days | Match or exceed DSO |
| DIO (Days Inventory Outstanding) | (Inventory / COGS) × Days | Industry-specific |
| Cash Conversion Cycle | DSO + DIO - DPO | Lower is better |
7. Aging Analysis
Accounts Receivable Aging
Customer Current 1-30 31-60 61-90 90+ Total % of AR
──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Acme Corp 25,000 10,000 5,000 — — 40,000 26.7%
Beta LLC 15,000 8,000 — 3,000 — 26,000 17.3%
Gamma Inc 20,000 — — — 12,000 32,000 21.3%
All Others 30,000 15,000 5,000 2,000 — 52,000 34.7%
──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Total 90,000 33,000 10,000 5,000 12,000 150,000 100%
% of Total 60.0% 22.0% 6.7% 3.3% 8.0% 100%
Reserve Rate 0% 0% 5% 25% 50%
Reserve Amount — — 500 1,250 6,000 7,750
Collection Priority Matrix
| Bucket | Action | Frequency | Escalation |
|---|
| Current | Thank-you / relationship | Monthly | None |
| 1-30 past due | Friendly reminder email | Weekly | None |
| 31-60 past due | Phone call + formal letter | 2x/week | AR Manager |
| 61-90 past due | Demand letter + payment plan | Daily | Controller |
| 90+ past due | Legal review + reserve | Daily | CFO |
Accounts Payable Aging
Mirror the AR structure but optimize for:
- Early payment discounts (2/10 Net 30 = 36.7% annualized return)
- Cash flow timing (pay on last day of terms, not before)
- Vendor relationship management (strategic vendors get priority)
8. Bank Reconciliation Patterns
Standard Reconciliation Format
Bank Balance per Statement (2/28/2026) $125,432.18ADD: Deposits in Transit
2/27 - Customer payment #4521 8,500.00
2/28 - Wire transfer (pending) 15,000.00
23,500.00
LESS: Outstanding Checks
Check #3041 (1/15) - Vendor payment (2,300.00)
Check #3055 (2/20) - Rent (5,000.00)
Check #3058 (2/25) - Supplies (450.00)
(7,750.00)
LESS: Bank Errors
(None this period) 0.00
Adjusted Bank Balance $141,182.18
Book Balance per GL (2/28/2026) $141,682.18
LESS: Bank Charges
Monthly service fee (35.00)
Wire fee (25.00)
ADD: Interest Earned
February interest 12.00
LESS: NSF Checks
Customer ABC - returned check (452.00)
Adjusted Book Balance $141,182.18
DIFFERENCE $0.00 ✓ RECONCILED
Stale Items Investigation
Any reconciling item older than 30 days requires investigation:
| Age | Item Type | Action |
|---|
| 30-60 days | Outstanding check | Contact payee, confirm receipt |
| 60-90 days | Outstanding check | Void and reissue if needed |
| 90+ days | Outstanding check | Void, reverse entry, escheatment review |
| 30+ days | Deposit in transit | Investigate with bank, possible misposting |
9. Financial Statement Review Checklist
Before releasing any financial statement, verify:
Balance Sheet
- [ ] Assets = Liabilities + Equity (must balance to the penny)
- [ ] Cash ties to bank reconciliation
- [ ] AR ties to aging report and subledger
- [ ] AP ties to aging report and subledger
- [ ] Fixed assets tie to depreciation schedule
- [ ] Debt balances tie to loan statements
- [ ] Retained earnings = Prior RE + Net Income - Dividends
- [ ] Intercompany balances eliminate to zero
Income Statement
- [ ] Revenue recognized per ASC 606 / IFRS 15 criteria
- [ ] COGS matches inventory movement
- [ ] Depreciation/amortization matches fixed asset schedule
- [ ] Interest expense matches debt schedule
- [ ] Tax provision is reasonable (effective rate within expected range)
- [ ] No below-the-line items without disclosure
- [ ] Period-over-period comparison is sensible (no sign errors)
Cash Flow Statement
- [ ] Operating + Investing + Financing = Change in Cash
- [ ] Change in cash ties to balance sheet cash movement
- [ ] Non-cash items properly excluded from operating section
- [ ] CapEx in investing ties to fixed asset additions
- [ ] Debt proceeds/payments tie to balance sheet debt movement
- [ ] Supplemental disclosures (interest paid, taxes paid) are accurate
Analytical Review
- [ ] Gross margin is within 2pp of prior period (or explained)
- [ ] Revenue growth is consistent with known business activity
- [ ] No expense line items with >25% unexplained variance
- [ ] Ratios (current, quick, leverage) are within covenant requirements
- [ ] Month-over-month trends are logical
- [ ] YTD figures match sum of monthly figures