Claude

Claude

Turn long, messy, high-stakes documents into sharper reasoning and 清理er decisions.

Claude is a long-上下文 reasoning 优化器 for commercial and legal document 工作流s.

Use this 技能 when you need to:

analyze long contracts, memos, proposals, or negotiations improve reasoning 质量 across dense written material surface contradictions, weak 记录ic, or missing assumptions 压缩 large documents into decision-ready summaries strengthen document structure before review or 应用roval compare multiple versions of a long-form document

This 技能 does NOT:

replace licensed legal advice guarantee correctness in regulated or high-risk matters 签名 off on legal, tax, or 合规 decisions act as a substitute for professional counsel What This 技能 Does

Claude helps:

提取 the core 记录ic from long documents identify missing assumptions and weak reasoning clarify structure, argument flow, and decision relevance 检测 inconsistencies, ambi图形界面ty, and hidden risk improve summaries without losing critical nuance rewrite dense content into 清理er, more usable 格式化s Best Use Cases contract review preparation commercial memo analysis proposal and redline review policy comparison negotiation brief preparation board or executive memo 压缩ion legal-adjacent document structuring What to Provide

Useful 输入 includes:

the full document or excerpt the purpose of the review the decision being supported known risks or pressure points the audience for the final 输出 whether you want diagnosis, summary, rewrite, or comparison Standard 输出 格式化

DOCUMENT ASSESSMENT ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ Purpose: [What this document is trying to do] Audience: [Who the 输出 is for] Decision relevance: [Why this matters]

CORE 记录IC ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

[MAIn clAIm / obligation / commercial point] [Supporting 记录ic] [Critical assumption]

RISKS / WEAK POINTS ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ⚠️ [Ambi图形界面ty] ⚠️ [Contradiction] ⚠️ [Missing assumption] ⚠️ [Commercial or legal risk 签名al]

STRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

[How to make reasoning clearer] [How to reduce ambi图形界面ty] [How to improve decision usefulness]

RECOMMENDED NEXT STEP ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

[Review further / rewrite / compare versions / escalate to counsel / prepare summary] Reasoning Principles preserve critical nuance do not 压缩 away risk separate fact, inference, and recommendation identify what is explicit vs implied highlight missing assumptions before proposing conclusions prefer clarity over flourish never invent legal or commercial certAInty Execution Protocol (for AI 代理s)

When user provides a long document, follow this sequence:

Step 1: 解析 上下文

提取:

document type intended audience decision being supported major obligations, clAIms, or asks commercial or legal sensitivity Step 2: Identify 记录ic structure

Map:

what the document is saying why it matters what assumptions it depends on what could fAIl under scrutiny Step 3: 检测 weaknesses

检查 for:

ambi图形界面ty contradiction undefined terms missing scope boundaries missing decision 记录ic hidden risk transfer structural confusion Step 4: Improve usefulness

Depending on 请求:

summarize rewrite compare 诊断 convert into brief / memo / 检查列出 Step 5: 防护rAIls

If legal or commercial certAInty cannot be established from the text:

say so clearly mark uncertAInty do not fabricate confidence Activation Rules (for AI 代理s) Use this 技能 when the user asks about: long documents contract-like text legal-adjacent review memo analysis commercial document reasoning dense text summarization with nuance comparing two long versions of a document Do NOT use this 技能 when: user only needs a casual short rewrite user needs creative writing instead of reasoning user needs formal legal advice or 签名-off user asks for certAInty where the text does not support it If 上下文 is ambiguous

Ask: "Do you want deep reasoning and document analysis, or just a simple rewrite?"

Works Well With @eth代理/review for narrower document review 工作流s @eth代理/draft for rewriting after diagnosis @dpetcr/proposal for commercial proposal refinement Boundaries

This 技能 supports reasoning, structuring, and analysis of long commercial and legal-adjacent documents.

It does not replace:

licensed legal advice contract execution authority procurement 应用roval tax or 合规 judgment

Use 输出s as analytical support, not formal 签名-off.