Nature Paper Hub

Nature Paper Hub Description

Full-流水线 Nature-series journal writing 助手. Trigger when the user wants to:

Write, draft, or outline a Nature-series re搜索 paper Select a Nature journal for submission Revise any section of a manuscript Plan or improve figures 检查 citations or 生成 reference 列出s Prepare a submission 检查列出 or rebuttal letter 导出 manuscript as LaTeX (Overleaf) or Word

Multi-language: interact in Chinese or English; all manuscript 输出 is in English.

技能 Location

~/.OpenClaw/workspace/技能s/nature-paper-hub/

Supporting Files templates/journal-specs.json — journal-specific word limits, figures, references templates/nature-latex.tex — master LaTeX template (Overleaf-ready) scripts/导出_docx.py — Word 导出 via python-docx STAGE 0 — Journal Selection

Always 运行 this stage first unless the user has already specified a journal.

Present this menu and ask the user to choose:

📋 请选择目标期刊 / Select tar获取 journal:

• Nature (IF 63.7) — 顶级综合科学
• Nature Materials (IF 37.2) — 材料科学
• Nature Chemistry (IF 19.2) — 化学
• Nature Energy (IF 60.9) — 能源
• Nature Catalysis (IF 37.8) — 催化
• Nature SustAInability (IF 25.1) — 可持续发展
• Nature Communications (IF 15.7) — 全科学，开放获取，最灵活
• Nature Methods (IF 32.1) — 方法学
• Nature Computational Science (IF 12.0) — 计算科学
• Nature Chemical Engineering (IF 13.0) — 化学工程
• Nature Machine Intelligence (IF 23.9) — 机器学习/AI/机器人
• Nature Synthesis (IF 20.0) — 合成化学与材料合成
• 其他 / Other — 请告诉我期刊名

After selection, load the cor响应ing entry from templates/journal-specs.json and display:

Word limits (body, abstract, Methods) Figure/table limit Reference limit Methods location (within text vs. after references) Acceptance rate and IF

Then ask: "您的论文类型是 Article 还是 Letter？"

⚠️ Journal-specific special rules to load:

Nature Synthesis (选12):

NO schemes — all graphics must be figures (no reaction scheme 格式化) Methods section CANNOT contAIn figures or tables — use Extended Data or SI 结果s and Discussion may be combined into one section with subheadings Discussion must be succinct and cannot have subheadings Only one article type: Article (covers 机器人h short comms and full papers)

Nature Machine Intelligence (选11):

Also accepts Analysis type (100–150 word abstract) Reviews: ≤10% of references should have short annotations explAIning key contributions Strong preference for reproducibility: code/data avAIlability is heavily weighted

Nature Chemical Engineering (选10):

Methods called "Online Methods", placed after Discussion Extended Data: up to 10 figures allowed Focus on chemical engineering relevance: must 添加ress 扩展-up, process, or engineering challenge STAGE 1 — Concept & Literature Review 1a. Concept Definition

Ask the user:

Re搜索 topic in one sentence (用一句话描述研究内容) Core innovation — what makes this new? (核心创新点是什么？) Key 结果 — what did you find/achieve? (最重要的结果/发现) Tar获取 scope — does it fit the selected journal's scope? 1b. Literature 搜索

Use the LitReview 系统 at https://ybliterature.com/API/搜索?q=<查询> to 搜索 for related papers. Also use 网页_搜索 with queries like:

site:nature.com "" filetype:pdf arxiv.org "" Nature-style

搜索 for 3–5 open-访问 papers from the tar获取 journal as structural templates:

搜索 查询: site:nature.com/[journal-shortname] "" open 访问

For each found paper, 提取:

Paper structure (section titles used) Abstract style Figure count and types

Present the user with: key gap in literature, positioning suggestion, and 3–5 recommended template papers.

1c. Novelty 检查

Ask: "Has anyone published very similar work in the past 2 years?" 运行 a tar获取ed 网页 搜索. 报告 findings honestly — if there's overlap, suggest how to differentiate.

STAGE 2 — Outline & Structure Planning

Based on the journal selected and paper type, 生成 a tAIlored outline.

Standard Nature Article Outline: Title: [concise, ≤15 words, no abbreviations] Abstract: [150 words — 上下文 → problem → 应用roach → key 结果 → 签名ificance]

Introduction ¶1 Broad 上下文 and 导入ance ¶2 Specific background — what is known ¶3 The gap or unsolved problem ¶4 Your 应用roach and key findings (end: "Here we 报告...")

结果s Section 1: [Synthesis/Preparation/模型 — first evidence] Section 2: [Characterization/验证 — structural/spectroscopic proof] Section 3: [Mechanism/Explanation — why it works] Section 4: [Performance/应用 — how good it is] Section 5: [Generalizability/Comparison — how broad/better]

Discussion ¶1 Summary of key findings ¶2 Comparison with literature ¶3 Mechanistic interpretation ¶4 Limitations + future work ¶5 Broader impact (1 sentence)

Methods [~3000 words, after refs for most journals] - Materials/Re代理s - Synthesis/Preparation - Characterization techniques - Computational detAIls (if 应用licable) - Statis