📦 Self-Improving Business — 实用工具

v1.0.0

Captures business administration issues, policy gaps, KPI misalignment, decision delays, handoff failures, and stakeholder misalignment to improve operationa...

0· 9·0 当前·0 累计
jose-compu 头像by @jose-compu (José I. O.)·MIT-0
下载技能包
License
MIT-0
最后更新
2026/4/14
0
安全扫描
VirusTotal
无害
查看报告
OpenClaw
安全
high confidence
The skill is internally coherent: it is a reminder/documentation helper that creates local .learnings logs and optionally installs lightweight OpenClaw hooks and scripts; it does not ask for credentials, network endpoints, or unexpected system access.
评估建议
This skill appears to do exactly what it claims: provide reminder-only logging and lightweight hook reminders. Before enabling or installing, do these simple checks: (1) review the included scripts (scripts/*.sh) and hook handlers (hooks/openclaw/handler.{js,ts}) to confirm they only write local markdown and inject reminder text (they do), (2) if you plan to run the manual git clone command, review the remote repository content and source owner, (3) enabling the hook will copy files into ~/.open...
详细分析 ▾
用途与能力
Name/description (capture operational issues and log learnings) align with the included artifacts: markdown templates, example entries, helper scripts, and OpenClaw hook handlers. All required capabilities (local logging, optional hook reminders) match the stated purpose.
指令范围
Runtime instructions and scripts are focused on creating and appending local markdown logs (.learnings/LEARNINGS.md, BUSINESS_ISSUES.md, FEATURE_REQUESTS.md) and injecting reminder text at agent bootstrap. The scripts reference the CLAUDE_TOOL_OUTPUT environment variable (used by the PostToolUse detector) — this is expected for the stated hook behavior but is not listed in a requires.env section. No instructions ask the agent to read unrelated secrets or transmit data externally.
安装机制
The package is instruction-first and includes local scripts and hook code (no install spec). SKILL.md offers a manual git clone URL (github.com/jose-compu/self-improving-business) as an install option; cloning pulls code from a third-party GitHub account — review that repo if you plan to use the manual path. No download-from-arbitrary-URL or archive extraction is present in the package itself.
凭证需求
The skill declares no required environment variables or credentials. The scripts use CLAUDE_TOOL_OUTPUT to inspect command output when used as a PostToolUse hook; this is proportionate to a pattern detector. No other secrets, API tokens, or unrelated environment variables are requested.
持久化与权限
The skill is not always-enabled and is user-invocable. It includes optional hooks that, when installed/enabled, will write into ~/.openclaw/hooks or push virtual bootstrap files during agent startup. Enabling hooks modifies agent behaviour (adds reminder injection) but does not escalate privileges or alter other skills' credentials.
安全有层次,运行前请审查代码。

License

MIT-0

可自由使用、修改和再分发,无需署名。

运行时依赖

无特殊依赖

版本

latestv1.0.02026/4/14

Initial release of the self-improving-business skill for operational learning and process improvement documentation. - Captures business administration issues, policy gaps, KPI misalignment, decision delays, handoff failures, and stakeholder misalignment. - Provides quick-reference logging guidance and standardized markdown formats for learnings, issues, and feature requests. - Enforces reminder-only, documentation-focused usage—no approvals or automated actions; human review required for all decisions. - Includes initialization and setup instructions for OpenClaw and generic agents. - Supports promotion of key learnings to reusable playbooks, KPI registries, governance artifacts, and cadence checklists.

无害

安装命令

点击复制
官方npx clawhub@latest install self-improving-business
镜像加速npx clawhub@latest install self-improving-business --registry https://cn.longxiaskill.com

技能文档

Log business administration learnings, operational issues, and governance improvements to markdown files for continuous improvement. This skill focuses on business administration operations, cross-functional coordination, process governance, KPI tracking, execution risk, policy consistency, stakeholder communication, and operational decision quality.

CRITICAL: Safety Posture (Reminder-Only)

This skill is documentation and reminder only.

It does not execute or authorize:

  • spending approvals
  • vendor commitments
  • payroll actions
  • legal actions
  • procurement commitments
  • policy sign-offs
  • executive approvals

Use this skill to capture structured findings and recommendations. Human owners remain responsible for all high-impact business decisions.

Always require explicit human approval for high-impact decisions, including:

  • budget reallocations
  • vendor selection or termination
  • policy exceptions
  • operating model changes
  • governance escalations
  • staffing or compensation effects

First-Use Initialisation

Before logging anything, ensure the .learnings/ directory and files exist in the project or workspace root. If any are missing, create them:

mkdir -p .learnings
[ -f .learnings/LEARNINGS.md ] || printf "# Business Learnings\n\nBusiness administration learnings across process, governance, KPI tracking, and decision quality.\n\nCategories: process_breakdown | policy_gap | kpi_misalignment | decision_latency | handoff_failure | stakeholder_misalignment | documentation_drift | compliance_oversight\nAreas: planning | execution | governance | reporting | operations | budgeting | procurement | vendor_management | risk_management | communication\n\n---\n" > .learnings/LEARNINGS.md
[ -f .learnings/BUSINESS_ISSUES.md ] || printf "# Business Issues Log\n\nOperational execution issues, policy inconsistencies, KPI risks, and governance concerns.\n\n---\n" > .learnings/BUSINESS_ISSUES.md
[ -f .learnings/FEATURE_REQUESTS.md ] || printf "# Business Operations Feature Requests\n\nBusiness administration automation and process-improvement requests.\n\n---\n" > .learnings/FEATURE_REQUESTS.md

Never overwrite existing files. This is a no-op if .learnings/ is already initialised.

Do not treat this skill as an approval engine. It is a structured learning and reminder system only.

If you want automatic reminders, use the opt-in workflow in Hook Integration.

Quick Reference

SituationAction
Missed SLA in operational workflowLog to .learnings/BUSINESS_ISSUES.md with decision_latency or process_breakdown
KPI value disputed due to conflicting definitionsLog to .learnings/LEARNINGS.md with kpi_misalignment
Policy exists but team did not follow itLog to .learnings/BUSINESS_ISSUES.md with policy_gap
Handoff failed between departmentsLog to .learnings/BUSINESS_ISSUES.md with handoff_failure
Stakeholder expectations diverge from execution planLog to .learnings/LEARNINGS.md with stakeholder_misalignment
Dashboard differs from source-of-truth reportLog to .learnings/LEARNINGS.md with documentation_drift
Compliance or audit requirement missed in workflowLog to .learnings/BUSINESS_ISSUES.md with compliance_oversight
Similar entry already existsAdd See Also, increase recurrence metadata
Reusable operating guidance emergesPromote to playbook/checklist/KPI registry/RACI/cadence artifact

OpenClaw Setup (Recommended)

OpenClaw is the primary platform for this skill. It uses workspace-based prompt injection with automatic skill loading.

Installation

Via ClawdHub (recommended):

clawdhub install self-improving-business

Manual:

git clone https://github.com/jose-compu/self-improving-business.git ~/.openclaw/skills/self-improving-business

Create Learning Files

mkdir -p ~/.openclaw/workspace/.learnings

Then create the log files (or copy from assets/):

  • LEARNINGS.md - reusable business learnings and governance improvements
  • BUSINESS_ISSUES.md - execution problems, policy misses, and risk items
  • FEATURE_REQUESTS.md - requested capabilities for administration workflows

Promotion Targets

When business patterns are broadly applicable, promote them:

Learning TypePromote ToExample
Repeatable cross-team processProcess playbooks"Procurement intake triage in 2 business days"
Governance controls and checksGovernance checklists"Quarterly policy attestation for budget owners"
KPI definition clarityKPI definition registry"On-time delivery = committed date at order acceptance"
Ownership ambiguity resolutionRACI matrix updates"Vendor SLA exceptions accountable by Operations Director"
Execution rhythm improvementsOperating cadences"Weekly risk triage + monthly KPI review forum"
Agent collaboration patternAGENTS.md"Route budgeting conflicts to governance triage agent"

Optional: Enable Hook

For automatic reminders at session start:

cp -r hooks/openclaw ~/.openclaw/hooks/self-improving-business
openclaw hooks enable self-improving-business

See references/openclaw-integration.md for complete details.


Generic Setup (Other Agents)

For Claude Code, Codex, Copilot, or other agents, create .learnings/ in the project or workspace root:

mkdir -p .learnings

Create the files inline using the headers shown above.

Agent file reminder

Add a short note in AGENTS.md or CLAUDE.md to log LRN/BUS/FEAT entries and keep this workflow reminder-only with human approval for high-impact decisions.

Logging Format

Learning Entry [LRN-YYYYMMDD-XXX]

Append to .learnings/LEARNINGS.md:

## [LRN-YYYYMMDD-XXX] category

Logged: ISO-8601 timestamp Priority: low | medium | high | critical Status: pending Area: planning | execution | governance | reporting | operations | budgeting | procurement | vendor_management | risk_management | communication

Summary

One-line description of the business learning

Details

Context of the finding: what happened, which teams were involved, where the process, policy, KPI definition, or communication failed, and what improved outcome is expected.

Recommended Action

Specific process correction, governance control, KPI definition update, or cadence change. Reminder-only: this does not execute approvals.

Metadata

  • Source: meeting_review | retrospective | dashboard_audit | vendor_sync | finance_review | incident_postmortem
  • Stakeholders: operations | finance | procurement | legal | hr | product | sales
  • Related Files: path/to/process.md, path/to/report.csv
  • Tags: tag1, tag2
  • See Also: LRN-20260413-001
  • Pattern-Key: ops.handoff_failure | kpi.definition_mismatch (optional)
  • Recurrence-Count: 1 (optional)
  • First-Seen: 2026-04-13 (optional)
  • Last-Seen: 2026-04-13 (optional)


Categories for learnings:

CategoryUse When
process_breakdownA repeatable business process fails due to missing or weak controls
policy_gapExisting policy is absent, unclear, or not operationalized
kpi_misalignmentKPI meaning, source, or target differs across functions
decision_latencyDecision gates are consistently delayed and impact execution
handoff_failureWork transfer between teams causes errors or delays
stakeholder_misalignmentStakeholders disagree on goals, scope, or priorities
documentation_driftDocumentation diverges from actual process or system behavior
compliance_oversightInternal or external compliance expectations are not met

Business Issue Entry [BUS-YYYYMMDD-XXX]

Append to .learnings/BUSINESS_ISSUES.md:

## [BUS-YYYYMMDD-XXX] issue_type

Logged: ISO-8601 timestamp Priority: critical | high | medium | low Status: pending Area: planning | execution | governance | reporting | operations | budgeting | procurement | vendor_management | risk_management | communication Severity: critical | high | medium | low

Summary

Brief description of the business issue

Issue Details

What happened, why it matters, where dependencies broke, and what operational risk emerged. Keep this as a documented finding and recommendation; this skill does not execute decisions.

Impact Assessment

  • Affected functions and owners
  • KPI or SLA impact estimate
  • Cost or budget impact range
  • Governance or compliance implication

Recommended Action

  • Immediate containment steps
  • Owner + escalation path
  • Long-term process hardening
  • Human approval required for any high-impact decisions

Timeline

  • Identified: ISO-8601
  • Escalated: ISO-8601 (if applicable)
  • Resolved: ISO-8601 (if applicable)

Metadata

  • Trigger: sla_miss | approval_delay | raci_conflict | kpi_variance | budget_alert | handoff_block | policy_missing | audit_finding | dependency_blocked
  • Stakeholders: operations | finance | procurement | vendor_management | compliance | leadership
  • Related Files: path/to/doc
  • See Also: BUS-20260413-001


Feature Request Entry [FEAT-YYYYMMDD-XXX]

Append to .learnings/FEATURE_REQUESTS.md:

## [FEAT-YYYYMMDD-XXX] capability_name

Logged: ISO-8601 timestamp Priority: medium Status: pending Area: planning | execution | governance | reporting | operations | budgeting | procurement | vendor_management | risk_management | communication

Requested Capability

What business administration capability is needed

Business Justification

Why it improves speed, quality, policy consistency, or risk reduction

Complexity Estimate

simple | medium | complex

Suggested Implementation

How this could be built: workflow automation, dashboard guardrails, dependency tracker, handoff checklist, policy linting, governance workflow reminders.

Metadata

  • Frequency: first_time | recurring
  • Related Features: existing_tool_or_feature
  • Benefit: cycle_time | decision_quality | risk_reduction | policy_consistency


ID Generation

Format: TYPE-YYYYMMDD-XXX

  • TYPE: LRN (learning), BUS (business issue), FEAT (feature request)
  • YYYYMMDD: Current date
  • XXX: Sequential number or random 3 chars (for example 001, A7B)

示例: LRN-20260413-001, BUS-20260413-A3F, FEAT-20260413-002

Resolving Entries

When an issue is resolved, update the entry:

  • Change Status: pending to Status: resolved
  • Add a resolution block after Metadata:
### Resolution
  • Resolved: 2026-04-13T09:00:00Z
  • Action Taken: Brief description of process or governance fix
  • Artifact Updated: Playbook/checklist/KPI registry/RACI/cadence reference
  • Verified By: operations review | finance review | governance committee | internal audit

Other status values:

  • in_progress - actively being remediated
  • wont_fix - risk accepted with documented rationale and human approver
  • promoted - elevated to permanent business operating artifacts
  • promoted_to_skill - extracted as reusable skill

Detection Triggers

Automatically log when you encounter:

Execution Signals (learning or business issue):

  • missed SLA on committed deliverable
  • overdue approval at decision gate
  • repeated dependency blocked status
  • handoff without complete acceptance criteria

Governance Signals (learning or business issue):

  • policy exists but team follows outdated practice
  • control owner unknown or contested
  • RACI accountability conflict between teams
  • governance board receives contradictory status reports

KPI Signals (learning):

  • KPI definition mismatch across dashboards
  • variance unexplained beyond tolerance band
  • lagging metrics reported as leading indicators

Budget and Procurement Signals (business issue):

  • budget overrun warning without mitigation owner
  • purchase request bypasses policy threshold
  • vendor onboarding stalled at approval handoff

Compliance and Documentation Signals (learning):

  • audit issue reveals missing process evidence
  • runbook differs from actual operational behavior
  • required approval record missing for material decision

Priority Guidelines

PriorityWhen to UseBusiness Examples
criticalMaterial operational disruption, uncontrolled budget risk, or compliance exposurePayroll-impacting process outage, major procurement exception without approval trail
highSLA misses, delayed governance decisions, or significant KPI varianceMissed month-end close dependency, recurring approval bottleneck
mediumImportant process hardening or definition alignment workKPI glossary mismatch, outdated handoff checklist
lowDocumentation cleanup and minor process optimizationNaming consistency updates, low-risk reporting cleanup

Area Tags

Use these areas to classify learnings:

AreaScope
planningplanning cycles, prioritization, resource alignment
executiontask flow, dependency management, delivery completion
governanceapprovals, controls, operating model oversight
reportingKPI reporting quality, cadence, dashboard trust
operationsday-to-day process reliability and service delivery
budgetingbudget planning, variance review, spend controls
procurementpurchasing controls, approvals, sourcing process
vendor_managementvendor onboarding, SLA adherence, performance reviews
risk_managementrisk identification, escalation, mitigation tracking
communicationcross-functional alignment, decision clarity, status clarity

Promoting to Permanent Business Standards

When a learning is broadly applicable, promote it to business administration standards.

When to Promote

  • the same process breakdown recurs across teams
  • policy gap repeatedly creates execution risk
  • KPI definition issue causes repeated reporting conflicts
  • decision latency appears in multiple planning or governance cycles
  • handoff failures recur with shared root causes

Promotion Targets

TargetWhat Belongs There
Process playbooksdocumented steps, guardrails, exception routing
Governance checklistsdecision controls, evidence requirements, escalation criteria
KPI definition registrymetric owners, formulas, data sources, review cadence
RACI matrix updatesrole clarity for accountable/responsible/consulted/informed
Operating cadencesrecurring forums, review rituals, frequency and owners
CLAUDE.mdagent operating conventions for business context
AGENTS.mdcross-agent routing and workflow orchestration

How to Promote

  • Distill the finding into concise and reusable operational guidance
  • Add it to the correct target artifact
  • Update original entry:
- set Status: promoted - add Promoted: process_playbook (or other target)
  • confirm human owner for adoption and enforcement

Promotion Examples

Learning to governance checklist:

Overdue approvals repeatedly blocked procurement. Added checklist rule: "Any approval older than 48h triggers escalation to backup approver."

Learning to KPI registry:

Revenue-at-risk definition mismatched between sales and finance. Registered canonical formula and source system for both teams.

Recurring Pattern Detection

If logging something similar to an existing entry:

  • Search first: rg "keyword" .learnings/
  • Link entries with See Also
  • Increment recurrence fields
  • Raise priority if impact is increasing
  • Trigger systemic fix proposal when recurrence exceeds threshold

Recurring business patterns usually indicate one or more root causes:

  • missing process control
  • weak policy communication
  • unclear ownership model
  • inconsistent KPI definition
  • brittle cross-team handoff protocol
  • insufficient governance cadence

Simplify/Harden Feed

Keep incoming signals easy to process, and harden the learning feed against noise.

Simplify Rules

  • prefer one clear issue statement per entry
  • include only evidence needed for a decision
  • use standard categories and area tags
  • avoid duplicating the same incident in multiple files
  • route uncertain items to pending with explicit open questions

Harden Rules

  • require source attribution in metadata
  • require owner and next action for high and critical
  • require explicit approval note for wont_fix
  • require recurrence tracking for repeated issues
  • require status updates before review meetings

Periodic Review

Review .learnings/ at operational checkpoints.

When to Review

  • before weekly operating review
  • before monthly business review
  • before quarterly planning cycle
  • before budget review forums
  • after major incident retrospectives
  • before governance committee decisions

Quick Status Check

rg "Status\\\\: pending" .learnings/.md | wc -l
rg "Priority\\\\: critical|Priority\\\\: high" .learnings/.md
rg "Area\\\\: budgeting|Area\\\\: procurement" .learnings/.md
rg "Category\\\\:|\\] process_breakdown|\\] decision_latency" .learnings/.md

Review Actions

  • close resolved entries and capture verification evidence
  • merge duplicates and strengthen canonical entries
  • promote proven patterns to permanent artifacts
  • add or adjust operating cadence for recurring issues

Hook Integration

Enable automatic reminders through hooks. This is opt-in.

Quick Setup (Claude Code / Codex)

Create .claude/settings.json:

{
  "hooks": {
    "UserPromptSubmit": [{
      "matcher": "",
      "hooks": [{
        "type": "command",
        "command": "./skills/self-improving-business/scripts/activator.sh"
      }]
    }]
  }
}

This injects a business-administration reminder after each prompt.

Advanced Setup (With Pattern Detection)

{
  "hooks": {
    "UserPromptSubmit": [{
      "matcher": "",
      "hooks": [{
        "type": "command",
        "command": "./skills/self-improving-business/scripts/activator.sh"
      }]
    }],
    "PostToolUse": [{
      "matcher": "Bash",
      "hooks": [{
        "type": "command",
        "command": "./skills/self-improving-business/scripts/error-detector.sh"
      }]
    }]
  }
}

Enable PostToolUse only if you want command output pattern reminders.

Available Hook Scripts

ScriptHook TypePurpose
scripts/activator.shUserPromptSubmitreminds to evaluate business learnings
scripts/error-detector.shPostToolUse (Bash)triggers on high-signal business patterns
See references/hooks-setup.md for details.

Automatic Skill Extraction

When a learning becomes stable and reusable, extract it into a dedicated skill.

Skill Extraction Criteria

CriterionDescription
recurringsame pattern appears in multiple teams or cycles
verifiedstatus is resolved with validated operational improvement
non-obviousrequired cross-functional reasoning or governance design
broadly applicableuseful outside a single incident
user-flaggeduser requests conversion into a reusable skill

Extraction Workflow

  • identify candidate entry
  • run helper:
   ./skills/self-improving-business/scripts/extract-skill.sh skill-name --dry-run
   ./skills/self-improving-business/scripts/extract-skill.sh skill-name
   
  • customize generated SKILL.md
  • update source entry status to promoted_to_skill
  • verify no transactional instructions were embedded

Multi-Agent Support

AgentActivationDetection
Claude Codehooksautomatic via scripts
Codex CLIhooksautomatic via scripts
GitHub Copilotmanual guidancemanual review
OpenClawworkspace injection + hookssession reminders
Regardless of agent, apply this workflow when you:

  • coordinate cross-functional delivery with dependencies
  • track KPI quality and reporting consistency
  • manage policy-governed approvals and exceptions
  • monitor budget, procurement, and vendor execution
  • document risk controls and escalation outcomes
  • resolve stakeholder alignment and communication gaps

Business Administration Best Practices

  • keep ownership explicit and visible in each entry
  • separate signal from symptom using root-cause notes
  • normalize KPI definitions before target discussions
  • document decision deadlines and escalation rules
  • review RACI regularly for contested responsibilities
  • harden handoffs with acceptance criteria and evidence
  • tie governance controls to actual operating cadences
  • use consistent tags for reporting and searchability
  • require human approval for high-impact decisions
  • avoid turning reminders into hidden execution commands

Gitignore Options

Keep learnings local when entries include sensitive business context:

.learnings/

Hybrid option (track structure, ignore contents):

.learnings/*.md
!.learnings/.gitkeep

Track learnings in-repo only when content is sanitized and approved for sharing.

Final Reminder

This skill is a structured memory and improvement mechanism. It does not approve, execute, sign, spend, commit, or authorize business actions. Use it to improve clarity and decision quality, and require human approval for high-impact outcomes.

Stackability Contract (Standalone + Multi-Skill)

This skill is standalone-compatible and stackable with other self-improving skills.

Namespaced Logging (recommended for 2+ skills)

  • Namespace for this skill: .learnings/business/
  • Keep current standalone behavior if you prefer flat files.
  • Optional shared index for all skills: .learnings/INDEX.md

Required Metadata

Every new entry must include:

Skill: business

Hook Arbitration (when 2+ skills are enabled)

  • Use one dispatcher hook as the single entrypoint.
  • Dispatcher responsibilities: route by matcher, dedupe repeated events, and rate-limit reminders.
  • Suggested defaults: dedupe key = event + matcher + file + 5m_window; max 1 reminder per skill every 5 minutes.

Narrow Matcher Scope (business)

Only trigger this skill automatically for business signals such as:
  • kpi|revenue|margin|strategy|roadmap
  • pricing|forecast|market shift|business case
  • explicit business intent in user prompt

Cross-Skill Precedence

When guidance conflicts, apply:
  • security
  • engineering
  • coding
  • ai
  • user-explicit domain skill
  • meta as tie-breaker

Ownership Rules

  • This skill writes only to .learnings/business/ in stackable mode.
  • It may read other skill folders for cross-linking, but should not rewrite their entries.
数据来源ClawHub ↗ · 中文优化:龙虾技能库