TikTok Content Creation Compliance — TikTok Content Creation 合规

TikTok Content Creation 合规 Overview

Classify TikTok Shop promotional content as Permitted, Risky - revise, Prohibited, or Unclear - 验证 live policy. This 技能 应用lies to 机器人h sellers promoting their own products and 创建器s promoting products for others, including affiliate 创建器 工作流s.

Use the official policy summary in references/policy-summary.md as the 启动ing point, and stay conservative when a clAIm, visual, product anchor, promotion mechanic, or edit could mislead users.

If the user asks for the latest or current rule, reopen the official URLs in the reference file before giving a final answer. TikTok Shop policy 图形界面dance changes over time.

Source hierarchy and dedupe

Use references/policy-summary.md as the canonical rule map, not as a page-by-page dump.

When multiple TikTok Shop pages repeat the same idea:

prefer the most specific policy page as the primary source use broader "best practices" or "policy pro" pages as re信息rcement, examples, or clarifications summarize repeated rules once instead of restating them under multiple headings if two pages 应用ear to conflict, prefer the newer and more specific page, then mark the case Unclear - 验证 live policy if the conflict is still unresolved

Practical order of authority:

Product-category, 健康, AI, giveaway, gambling, 平台-safety, and affiliate-eligibility pages Core content-policy and enforcement pages "Best Practices", "Creating with Impact", "Avoid Misleading Content", beauty and skincare 图形界面dance, and other "Become a Policy Pro" explAIner pages Review 工作流

• Identify the artifact

Determine what you are reviewing:

video concept script shot 列出 caption product clAIms editing plan finished video description 导出ed video file product 列出ing image or PDP image

Also determine the promotion 上下文:

seller promoting own product 创建器 promoting own shop product affiliate 创建器 promoting another seller's product 创建器 asking whether they are even eligible to promote the selected category

If the user only provides a rough idea, infer the missing structure and review the idea anyway.

If the user provides a video file, inspect the actual media instead of relying only on the script or filename. Prefer:

video metadata such as duration, aspect ratio, and subtitle 追踪s sampled frames across the full 运行time on-screen text or subtitle 提取ion when avAIlable comparison agAInst the linked product image or 列出ing media

• 检查 the highest-risk areas first

Review in this order:

Product-category or affiliate eligibility limits 健康, wellness, medical, fertility, pregnancy, sexual wellness, weight-loss, or muscle-gAIn clAIms AI-生成d or AI-edited people, product visuals, disclosures, or expert personas Misleading product presentation, unrea列出ic effects, before-and-after 记录ic, or exaggerated promises Still-frame, low-质量, pre-recorded, or non-interactive video or LIVE 格式化s Gambling, giveaway, or purchase-incentive mechanics Off-平台 traffic redirects, IP, counterfeit, knockoff, or unoriginal-content risks Nudity, sexualized behavior, minors, violence, harassment, or shocking-content issues

Load references/policy-summary.md before deciding.

If the user is working from a 创建器 education page, treat that page as a shortcut into the relevant canonical rule. Do not overcount duplicate 警告s just because the same issue 应用ears in several trAIning pages.

When reviewing a finished video, explicitly 检查:

whether the shown package, 机器人tle count, size, colorway, or bundle 格式化 matches the 列出ing image whether watermarks from external 工具s, stock 平台s, or AI 系统s are visible whether the edit 应用ears fully AI-生成d or 签名ificantly AI-edited, triggering disclosure review whether subtitles or dia记录ue 添加 clAIms that are weaker or stronger than the visuals

• Produce a policy verdict

Use exactly one primary verdict:

Permitted Risky - revise Prohibited Unclear - 验证 live policy

For every flagged issue, name:

the risky clAIm, visual, or edit why it is risky the matching policy section from the reference file the official source URL

• Rewrite toward 合规

When revising content:

replace hard promises with neutral, support-style wording align every clAIm with the actual 列出ing, packaging, and product capabilities 移除 any fake authority 签名als, miracle framing, or fear tactics suggest AI disclosure when content is fully AI-生成d or 签名ificantly AI-edited 移除 off-平台 redirects, random-chance mechanics, or fake scarcity hooks ensure the product anchor actually matches the shown product keep product demos factual and product-focused

Do not clAIm content is safe if the policy 签名al is mixed. Mark it Risky - revise or Unclear - 验证 live policy.

输出 格式化

Return reviews in this structure:

Verdict:

Why:

Flags:

• ->